MummyPlum wrote:
Skye, first off I'd like to say that I have the utmost respect for you. The tireless, thankless work you have done for kids with special needs astounds & humbles me in equal measure. You saying you despair of me hurt but I would like your opinion as I feel we are not on the same page. Can I ask what is your interpretation of inclusion?
While you ponder your response, I'll give you mine. You're aware that for my DD to reach her full potential we must emigrate as a family. I have spoken to many people in various settings but the one that springs to mind now is a member of the school board. He explained a 'peer programme' where the school board work closely with & engage the services of consultants who would work with school staff to explain dd's needs; more importantly IMO, they would work with dd's classmates to explain her needs; how her needs may differ to theirs; how her behaviour may differ to theirs, with the ultimate goal being A's peers would be aware of her needs, understand why she may behave differently in certain circumstances & act accordingly. Once they were happy A's peers were aware of her needs & how to act/react, they would fade into the background but still be available if needed. That IMO is inclusion. Inclusion through understanding. Inclusion through nurturing.
I'd liken inclusion in this country to 'rooming in' in maternity hospitals - great in theory, but alot needs to be done to make it work.
I have no issues with the resources available to A this year. She has a Fab teacher, Fab sna who is loved by all the kids, resource hours too. But the one issue I do have is her peers not being aware of her difficulties. I'm sure there is resentment when her classmates have to work while she is taken out to blow bubbles etc. They are not aware of her difficulties & therefore cannot react positively to them. While speaking highly of her teacher, sna & principal, I would call it forced inclusion & I don't think that will benefit anyone in the long run. I do believe that if A's classmates were aware of her difficulties they would be very nurturing & caring; such is human nature. As it stands, I feel she is being set up for alot of resentment.
Mummyplum,
I never meant to offend/hurt anyone in the previous thread but I was just trying to explain how we
need inclusion to work and to be the norm. I think if inclusion was the norm things would be different, I doubt any child would resent the extra time your Dd gets as instinctively everyone knows and accepts people are different. I don't think people should try to hide the fact that there is a difference either and in many cases I think it's good/better if
everyone understands/knows that someone is a little different or needs access to an SNA or resource hours etc. To be honest if Inclusion were the norm in society kids would know no different from the start...that's when inclusion needs to start.
My Dd was in playschool with a little girl with Down syndrome and a little boy with Aspergers. She was great pals with the lo with DS and she went on playdates etc. The playschool teacher said that having the lo with DS in the class had benefited everyone. Of course she had benefited too. There was no forced inclusion there.
Now tell me why you have to emigrate? As I did not know that.
My son is attending or supposed to be attending a Special school. He was denied an SNA as were 5 of his peers, 3 with Autism and 2 with Dual diagnosis DS/Autism, Kabuki syndrome and my son J dual diagnosis DS/Cinca syndrome. They were offered
One Hour per Day of schooling with SNA, some people understood that to mean they could attend but would only have access to an SNA for 1 hour. In reality it meant that J and his friends could only actually
attend for one hour. This fact that these children whose only hope to access any education was to attend a special school was snatched from them and nobody cared. This is not inclusion. Could you imagine if 6 neuro-typical kids were told "Sorry you can only attend school for one hour for the forseeable future" ....

It just wouldn't happen and there would be uproar (rightly so)
Sadly in the Special needs community as you know we are all too tired, too busy, too fraught to cause as much of an uproar as we'd like. We are a relatively small community too so when many of us are full-time carer's it makes things really difficult. We are easy prey.
Anyway back to the point I was trying to make on the other thread, All kids are equal, no-one deserves to be treated in any way differently including neuro-typical children, children of different races or religions. We need to embrace the
different, embrace
diversity.
In the last thread the main problem was that the Op hadn't gone to speak to the teacher/SNA about her huge concerns, her Dh spoke to the SNA on Fri and I'm sure she will follow it up again during the week. The main problem I had with that whole scenario and thread was that because the child had SN imparticular DS (which my son has) it hit a nerve. If the child in question had red hair and freckles would the same question have been posed at the end of the Op's first post? Would she have said " Should red-haired children with freckles be allowed to attend mainstream?" ............
NO...why? Because red haired children are plentiful and accepted in society. One day I hope that ALL our children will be accepted equally so.
Sorry if the reply is a long one and sorry for repeating similar stuff from the other thread but I just want to clarify where I'm coming from for those who aren't sure.
What I hope we have achieved from these threads over the last few days is raise awareness, promote inclusion and on some level 'normalise' disability....then at least we have broadened people's minds a little. For that I am grateful.
Over and out...
